<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speeding Tickets &amp; Google Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristy Bolsinger</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/comment-page-1#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristy Bolsinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=481#comment-272</guid>
		<description>&quot;Doing what is right for you and your end user... that&#039;s the answer&quot;
Yes it most certainly is.  As with just about anything, it&#039;s imperative to determine the level of risk you&#039;re willing to engage in.  That will tell you a lot about what you should, and shouldn&#039;t be doing.
Great post Kate!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Doing what is right for you and your end user&#8230; that&#8217;s the answer&#8221;<br />
Yes it most certainly is.  As with just about anything, it&#8217;s imperative to determine the level of risk you&#8217;re willing to engage in.  That will tell you a lot about what you should, and shouldn&#8217;t be doing.<br />
Great post Kate!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/comment-page-1#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 04:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=481#comment-256</guid>
		<description>I am not saying &quot;go out and rent links!!&quot; There is a balance to everything. Freaking out isn&#039;t the answer. Cheating the system isn&#039;t the answer. Doing what is right for you and your end user ... that&#039;s the answer. :P

And thank you ... I try to stay as level headed as possible. Sky isn&#039;t falling last time I checked. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not saying &#8220;go out and rent links!!&#8221; There is a balance to everything. Freaking out isn&#8217;t the answer. Cheating the system isn&#8217;t the answer. Doing what is right for you and your end user &#8230; that&#8217;s the answer. <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And thank you &#8230; I try to stay as level headed as possible. Sky isn&#8217;t falling last time I checked. <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judd Lyon</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/comment-page-1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Judd Lyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=481#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Glad to see a reasonable post on this subject, well done.

I get a kick out of all the search companies advising people that this will kill them, even though their link profile is littered with rented links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see a reasonable post on this subject, well done.</p>
<p>I get a kick out of all the search companies advising people that this will kill them, even though their link profile is littered with rented links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/comment-page-1#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=481#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Yes! Exactly. It&#039;s soooo annoying sometimes, but it happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! Exactly. It&#8217;s soooo annoying sometimes, but it happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/comment-page-1#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=481#comment-248</guid>
		<description>@stuart - Cya? LOL - I&#039;m lost ... You mean speeding down the road? Haha, enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@stuart &#8211; Cya? LOL &#8211; I&#8217;m lost &#8230; You mean speeding down the road? Haha, enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Crean</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/comment-page-1#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Crean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=481#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Do you do any game theory at business school?  One common approach is the “mixed strategy” where a player varies his/her action according to a set percentage.  This explains, for instance, why authorities inspect some, but not all, of the shipping containers at the port.  And why some percentage of people going through security at the airport gets a full detailed inspection while most get a more superficial inspection.  If the punishment for noncompliance is bad enough, the police only need to inspect a percentage.  The rest will be scared into complying because of the possibility that they might be one of the unlucky who gets inspected.

Google appears to have adopted a mixed strategy when it comes to punishing paid links.  I think that’s what frustrates so many.  Sometimes you report your competitors for paid links and Google apparently does nothing.  Other times, paid link reporting works.  For link sellers, it’s the same.  You can sometimes get away with a lot.  Other times you get punished.  People might scream that it’s all unfair, but it makes perfect sense from Google’s standpoint.  With a mixed strategy, you aren’t consistent.  You punish enough offenders to strike fear into the industry.  Google doesn’t have to be consistent and enforce every offense.  That would cost them a lot of money.  Selective enforcement is the best strategy for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you do any game theory at business school?  One common approach is the “mixed strategy” where a player varies his/her action according to a set percentage.  This explains, for instance, why authorities inspect some, but not all, of the shipping containers at the port.  And why some percentage of people going through security at the airport gets a full detailed inspection while most get a more superficial inspection.  If the punishment for noncompliance is bad enough, the police only need to inspect a percentage.  The rest will be scared into complying because of the possibility that they might be one of the unlucky who gets inspected.</p>
<p>Google appears to have adopted a mixed strategy when it comes to punishing paid links.  I think that’s what frustrates so many.  Sometimes you report your competitors for paid links and Google apparently does nothing.  Other times, paid link reporting works.  For link sellers, it’s the same.  You can sometimes get away with a lot.  Other times you get punished.  People might scream that it’s all unfair, but it makes perfect sense from Google’s standpoint.  With a mixed strategy, you aren’t consistent.  You punish enough offenders to strike fear into the industry.  Google doesn’t have to be consistent and enforce every offense.  That would cost them a lot of money.  Selective enforcement is the best strategy for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/05/speeding-tickets-google-guidelines.html/comment-page-1#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=481#comment-246</guid>
		<description>So basically cya. Read you loud and clear. Thanks for the tips :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically cya. Read you loud and clear. Thanks for the tips <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

