<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fake Spamming by SEOs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/09/fake-spamming-by-seos.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/09/fake-spamming-by-seos.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:51:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/09/fake-spamming-by-seos.html/comment-page-1#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=842#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Hey Mergen! Welcome to my site. The deletion of image files was separate I think, but we will never know. Twitter is going through some growing pains again, and I have a feeling this is just the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mergen! Welcome to my site. The deletion of image files was separate I think, but we will never know. Twitter is going through some growing pains again, and I have a feeling this is just the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/09/fake-spamming-by-seos.html/comment-page-1#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=842#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>You are probably right. I guess we can start deeming it &quot;fake spam&quot; as most of us have no bad intentions, but are &quot;super users&quot; that might seem bad to automated algos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably right. I guess we can start deeming it &#8220;fake spam&#8221; as most of us have no bad intentions, but are &#8220;super users&#8221; that might seem bad to automated algos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mergen, WebGuru</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/09/fake-spamming-by-seos.html/comment-page-1#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mergen, WebGuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=842#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>WOW, this is horrible.  My Twitter account profile background image and profile photo etc had all somehow reset recently.  It is probably unrelated but...

Let&#039;s just do a toast for all the good-doers out there!

From Mongolia with Love,
MC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, this is horrible.  My Twitter account profile background image and profile photo etc had all somehow reset recently.  It is probably unrelated but&#8230;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just do a toast for all the good-doers out there!</p>
<p>From Mongolia with Love,<br />
MC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Hilferding</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/09/fake-spamming-by-seos.html/comment-page-1#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Hilferding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=842#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>I suspect our behavior puts us statistically much closer to spammers than regular users. It may be as simple as having multiple accounts accessed from the same IP in too short of an amount of time. I suspect most of us have at least a few accounts that they regularly access throughout the course of a business day. Compare that to &quot;non-SEO types&quot; who simply don&#039;t have multiple accounts or, if they do, only rarely switch into their alternate accounts and I&#039;d bet it&#039;s a pretty strong signal for them.

Another good signal for them is probably the ratio of tweets that include a link and the ratio of links to particular sites. Spammers link a lot to the same site (or network of sites) and so do most social media marketers.

Since algorithmic solutions are a necessity to defeat the worst kinds of automated spam, I expect we&#039;ll experience the most collateral damage as social media sites tune their algorithms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect our behavior puts us statistically much closer to spammers than regular users. It may be as simple as having multiple accounts accessed from the same IP in too short of an amount of time. I suspect most of us have at least a few accounts that they regularly access throughout the course of a business day. Compare that to &#8220;non-SEO types&#8221; who simply don&#8217;t have multiple accounts or, if they do, only rarely switch into their alternate accounts and I&#8217;d bet it&#8217;s a pretty strong signal for them.</p>
<p>Another good signal for them is probably the ratio of tweets that include a link and the ratio of links to particular sites. Spammers link a lot to the same site (or network of sites) and so do most social media marketers.</p>
<p>Since algorithmic solutions are a necessity to defeat the worst kinds of automated spam, I expect we&#8217;ll experience the most collateral damage as social media sites tune their algorithms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
