<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kate Morris &#187; Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katemorris.com/category/marketing/ethics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katemorris.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Linkbaiting Ethics Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/05/linkbaiting-ethics-thoughts.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/05/linkbaiting-ethics-thoughts.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been lots being debated about ethics in SEM, and I do mean all of SEM. We have all gotten the question &#8220;so what do you do?&#8221; and tried to explain to no avail. People always resort to the &#8220;oh, you&#8217;re one of them???&#8221; And I spend the next 10 minutes explaining that I [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/05/linkbaiting-ethics-thoughts.html">Linkbaiting Ethics Thoughts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been lots being debated about ethics in SEM, and I do mean all of SEM. We have all gotten the question &#8220;so what do you do?&#8221; and tried to explain to no avail. People always resort to the &#8220;oh, you&#8217;re one of them???&#8221; And I spend the next 10 minutes explaining that I do not spam, make pop-ups, or otherwise annoy the hell out of people.</p>
<p>With a recent piece of link bait it went further: there was a debate about whether Google should be anyone&#8217;s mother. This was brought up because Matt Cutts, the lead of the webspam team at Google, noted that he was disappointed in what I assume is a friend for saying that she supported the link baiter and his tactics. Everyone got up in arms and the big debate started. These are my thoughts</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Point 1:</span> Matt has said numerous times that he is <span style="font-weight:bold;">not Google</span>. He works for them, but he is not the entire company. Sometimes what he says is just him. I have got to get on a soapbox for a minute &#8230; The man deserves a life. Let him just voice his PERSONAL opinion without it being &#8220;Google&#8217;s&#8221; opinion. Tons of people started saying &#8220;Google said&#8221; when in fact Matt said it.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Point 2:</span> What I understand as Matt&#8217;s point on Sphinn (where he was asked what Google thought, not what he thought) is that <span style="font-style:italic;">Google doesn&#8217;t want to trick people</span>. And that is just what this story did. Was it the writer&#8217;s fault? Not entirely, it was written as a satire and people picked it up as truth. But was it misleading, yes.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Point 3:</span> I don&#8217;t think there is anyway Google can &#8220;find&#8221; things like that algorithmically, but I think it was a scare tactic. Do we as an industry want everyone trying this? Making up stories to see if they stick? Not really.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Point 4:</span> The idea behind making up a story to get links is a bad one. It worked REALLY well for this person, but let&#8217;s not get people to duplicate it. Google&#8217;s mission, Matt&#8217;s mission, and a personal belief of mine is that we should do things for the good of everyone. I always understood link bait to be cool stories, features, things that made people go &#8220;wow.&#8221; But never something deceiving. If you want to use a satire as link bait, cool, but label as so.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Point 5:</span> Did this hurt anyone this time? No. Was it kinda funny? <span style="font-weight:bold;">Hell yeah.</span> But give the idea the right power and the right people talking about it, people will start to use it as a tactic. Then you have something that can hurt the ENTIRE industry. Who is going to trust any of us then?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/05/linkbaiting-ethics-thoughts.html">Linkbaiting Ethics Thoughts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/05/linkbaiting-ethics-thoughts.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guaranteed Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/04/guaranteed-rankings.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/04/guaranteed-rankings.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s 2008 and there are still companies doing the &#8220;Guaranteed #1 Ranking in Google&#8221; crap. I was in LinkedIn today and saw an ad for guaranteed rankings. I am NOT linking to them through here, but the name of the site is BeRankedNumber1 dot com. They even have a live chat person. I was curious, [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/04/guaranteed-rankings.html">Guaranteed Rankings</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s 2008 and there are still companies doing the &#8220;Guaranteed #1 Ranking in Google&#8221; crap. I was in LinkedIn today and saw an ad for guaranteed rankings. I am NOT linking to them through here, but the name of the site is BeRankedNumber1 dot com.</p>
<p>They even have a live chat person. I was curious, so I got online and asked what they do, what tactic they use. The response asked for my site and they&#8217;d tell me. I said no, that I wanted to know how they did it and if I could choose the words that I rank #1 for. All I got was &#8220;No what?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I can get anyone&#8217;s site ranking for some scatterbrained keyword. That&#8217;s so freaking easy. And what is more annoying is people fall for this shit. This site had no SEO for itself, but doing nothing that violates Google TOC, so I can&#8217;t really report it. I mean how do you explain to the world of non-internet people that this stuff doesn&#8217;t work? That they are throwing their $200/month down the drain.</p>
<p>This was right up there with the letter I got in the mail one day that said I owed $300 for SEO services. But at the bottom stated it wasn&#8217;t a bill. *sigh* These people should be locked away and beaten.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/04/guaranteed-rankings.html">Guaranteed Rankings</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/04/guaranteed-rankings.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Heartbreaking Tale</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/the-heartbreaking-tale.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/the-heartbreaking-tale.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got to sound off about this. It&#8217;s minorly related to SEM, but it needs to be said. The economy is in a collapse, we all know it. But those of us who work for a living aren&#8217;t really feeling it. I just took a job as an in-house SEO. The people I market to [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/the-heartbreaking-tale.html">The Heartbreaking Tale</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to sound off about this. It&#8217;s minorly related to SEM, but it needs to be said. The economy is in a collapse, we all know it. But those of us who work for a living aren&#8217;t really feeling it. I just took a job as an in-house SEO. The people I market to are in financial trouble and we provide help. This is not affecting me or the SEO world from what I can tell.</p>
<p>For the top executives at Bear Stearns, they feel it. Their &#8220;life savings&#8221; are now gone to a measly $28 million. Yes, that&#8217;s a far cry from the billions they used to have in stock of the company, but PEOPLE! Their bankers &#8230; I mean the REAL workers who have ONE house, maybe ONE car &#8230; if that &#8230; I doubt are hurting. They are still getting their paycheck.</p>
<p>This is what we get for relying on a system to make us money where we don&#8217;t do anything. Investing requires no work, no thought. The gamble was always there. And now these executives are outraged that they have to sell their weekend homes?? I don&#8217;t have a HOME! I rent! Their second car??? I am debating about getting a bike because I can&#8217;t afford the gas on my car. Given, its a nicer car (my mustang, not an Audi or anything), but still.</p>
<p>I am sorry. I feel no sympathy for these people. When Enron crashed I felt a little bad for the smaller people. But second homes and penthouses mean little to me. Live in one house, drive one car. You live in NYC, you don&#8217;t even NEED a car for crying out loud.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/the-heartbreaking-tale.html">The Heartbreaking Tale</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/the-heartbreaking-tale.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

