<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kate Morris &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katemorris.com/category/search-engines/microsoft/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katemorris.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ask from the Grave</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2010/05/ask-from-the-grave.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2010/05/ask-from-the-grave.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a large amount of hoopla over the Google UI change. This post was inspired by one over at WordStream asking if Google was the new Bing. I&#8217;ll say what a few people have said already, but I have a little more ranting behind it as well. Google&#8217;s new look is not Bing, it&#8217;s Ask. [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2010/05/ask-from-the-grave.html">Ask from the Grave</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a large amount of hoopla over the Google UI change. This post was inspired by one over at WordStream asking if <a href="http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2010/05/07/new-google-design" target="_blank">Google was the new Bing</a>. I&#8217;ll say what a few people have said already, but I have a little more ranting behind it as well. <a href="http://searchengineland.com/meet-the-new-google-41286" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s new look is not Bing, it&#8217;s Ask</a>.</p>
<p><div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 226px"><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/halloween-2006-zombie-jeeves/"><img class="   " style="margin-top: 3px; margin-bottom: 3px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Matt Cutts Ask Zombie" src="http://www.mattcutts.com/images/matt-cutts-halloween-zombie-jeeves.jpg" alt="Matt Cutts Ask Zombie" width="216" height="275" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2006 Matt Cutts as the Zombie Jeeves</p></div></p>
<p>A while ago (and we are talking years) at SMX Advanced 2007, the Google Dance Northwest to be exact, I watched as the <a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/06/google-dance-and-more-to-come.html" target="_blank">Ask PR Director</a> worked through the launch of Ask 3D. A few friends and I got a private tour of the new features, and I knew immediately that they were years ahead of their time. But they went and <a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/05/thoughts-on-askcom-again.html" target="_blank">threw it all away</a>.</p>
<p>(Funny enough, that night was when I first met Matt Cutts, who is in this picture. <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>Now, even though it was <a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/blended-search-and-askcom-findings.html" target="_blank">proven to work better</a> with users within the first few months, Google finally accepted it and is using the three column approach. It took Microsoft and Yahoo 2 years to adopt it, and Google 3 years. What does Ask get out of it? Nothing.</p>
<p>So I will say again. The Microsoft/Yahoo deal should not have happened. Instead, had Yahoo been smart, they would have bought Ask and AOL. *sigh* They might have tried, I don&#8217;t know, but what I do know is AOL, Ask and Yahoo are now all but dead. To Microsoft and Google &#8230; do you see the opportunity here? If you haven&#8217;t already, pick off the Ask talent. It&#8217;s being so wasted.</p>
<p>&lt;/rant&gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2010/05/ask-from-the-grave.html">Ask from the Grave</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2010/05/ask-from-the-grave.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality of a Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2010/03/quality-of-a-search-engine.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2010/03/quality-of-a-search-engine.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=1136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Folks in this room understand that the quality of a search engine depends heavily on the relevance of advertising, and the relevance of advertising relies on the volume of bids. Steve Ballmer, MSFT Sorry, Steve but I beg to differ. This was a quote from the SMX West show in March 2010. While I get [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2010/03/quality-of-a-search-engine.html">Quality of a Search Engine</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Folks in this room understand that the quality of a search engine depends heavily on the relevance of advertising, and the relevance of advertising relies on the volume of bids.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">Steve Ballmer, MSFT</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry, Steve but I beg to differ. This was a quote from the SMX West show in March 2010. While I get his point, and he was speaking to a room of search marketers, there is something flawed about his logic.</p>
<p>When Google started its upward climb, it was not the leader in advertising. Overture (GoTo, Yahoo, whatever) was. People started using Google because the results were relevant, natural and paid. Trust was given to the brand, and that is when &#8220;google&#8221; became a verb. You don&#8217;t become a part of societal vocabulary by getting advertising right. Steve is missing a few vital parts of the puzzle, and that seems to always be the issue over at Microsoft.</p>
<div class="c"><img src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Screen-shot-2010-03-29-at-11.37.52-PM-300x248.png" alt="quality of a search engine" width="300" height="248" /></div>
<p>The piece that is missing is the relevant results that bring in users. These results build trust in the brand. Returning users build the user base (traffic) which brings in advertisers, and advertisers bring in money and ads. Those ads do make the results more relevant, but it is not the ads that drive initial user trust and participation.</p>
<p><em>Disclaimer: I have not done research on this, and someone could easily prove me wrong. This post is from a marketing psychology point of view.</em></p>
<p>The quality of Google right now may be its ad network. Everyone knows that it is what makes Google so powerful. But any competitor to Google is going to have to understand that replacing that trust will have to occur to get users to switch.</p>
<p>I always hear advertisers say &#8220;I only use Google AdWords because, while it&#8217;s more expensive and the other networks convert better, the volume is just not there.&#8221; Remember that at higher volumes, generally, it is more difficult to convert. This is why you never just increase bids to be #1 in the ad line up. It&#8217;s not always profitable to be #1. There is a double meaning there MSFT.</p>
<p>Just something to think about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2010/03/quality-of-a-search-engine.html">Quality of a Search Engine</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2010/03/quality-of-a-search-engine.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Tip: Dayparting using Google Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good friend of mine that is getting into PPC asked me a question today. A question that I think is common to many people that are really digging into their campaigns. I am not talking to people just getting started (though you should read this too if you are) but those that are wanting [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html">PPC Tip: Dayparting using Google Analytics</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://davinciautomata.wordpress.com/2007/06/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-995 alignright" title="clock_screen02" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/clock_screen02-300x225.jpg" alt="clock_screen02" width="300" height="225" /></a>A good friend of mine that is getting into PPC asked me a question today. A question that I think is common to many people that are really digging into their campaigns. I am not talking to people just getting started <em>(though you should read this too if you are)</em> but those that are wanting to find the next step in campaign optimization.</p>
<p>The question centered around dayparting in Google but based on the specific industry their client was in, so after I guessed (educated guess, really &#8230;), I told them to look at the company&#8217;s analytics and see where their clients were visiting and buying. The retort was &#8220;Google Analytics doesn&#8217;t tell me that.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Poppycock. </strong></p>
<p>But I understood the confusion. Information by hour isn&#8217;t readily available but it is there. And I am going to show you how to pull the data. But to start, let&#8217;s review why dayparting might be important to you.</p>
<h3>Dayparting</h3>
<p>We get this term from traditional marketing. I first learned it in Introduction to Media Buying at The University of Texas. It had to do with radio and TV time purchasing. Imagine my delight when PPC started using it too. And it&#8217;s about the same. Dayparting is molding your spend to specific days and hours of the day to match when your best customers are looking.</p>
<p>Dayparting is not for every company. If you are a consumer based company, people are probably searching for your products at any hour of the day. Business-to-business firms are going to be more open to specifying a time of day. Consider business software &#8211; you might have some hard core people searching at night, or small business owners, but if your product is not focused to them, you probably don&#8217;t want to be running at 2am. Right? Good. Moving on.</p>
<h3>When are your Customers Online?</h3>
<p>Your analytics package should be able to tell you when customers are on your site. Above that, you should be tracking what time of the day people are purchasing if you are ecommerce. Google Analytics does provide this information to you, you just have to know where to look. Custom Reports FTW.</p>
<p>1. Get into your Google Analytics Account and find the <strong>&#8220;Custom Reporting&#8221; </strong>button on the left side navigation.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-984" title="GA Sidebar" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-10-at-2.10.18-AM-150x150.png" alt="GA Sidebar" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>2. Click and get the bigger menu. At the bottom click on <strong>&#8220;Manage Custom Reports.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>3. In the upper right side, click on <strong>&#8220;Create new custom report.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-985" title="Custom Text" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-10-at-2.12.46-AM.png" alt="Custom Text" width="242" height="54" /><br />
</strong></p>
<p>4. Title it (you&#8217;ll forget later) &#8211; hit edit next to the &#8220;Custom Report blah blah blah&#8221; up at the top.</p>
<p>5. First pick the metrics you want to see (in blue, see below). I am a fan of the metrics below, it&#8217;s a good place to start when you aren&#8217;t sure what to look at.</p>
<ul>
<li>Unique Visitors</li>
<li>Unique Pageviews</li>
<li>Total Goal Completions (you have to have goals set up to get data here)</li>
<li>Avg. Time on Site</li>
<li>Unique Purchases (must be e-commerce to use this)</li>
<li>Bounce Rate</li>
</ul>
<h3>Sample Google Analytics Dayparting Report Setup</h3>
<h3><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-987" title="sample dayparting report" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-10-at-2.15.04-AM.png" alt="sample dayparting report" width="578" height="277" /></h3>
<p>6. Once you get those, move to the green aka dimensions. This is where you pick what you are looking at. You can do one of three things here, or I recommend one of three.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Use one dimension </strong>- Time of Day &#8211; this is the minimal report and will help you see overall trends for time of day.</li>
<li><strong>Use two dimensions</strong> &#8211; (1) Day (2) Time of Day &#8211; this gets down to each day and how things worked out each hour. More detailed but maybe too detailed for some.</li>
<li><strong>Make both. </strong> <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Two separate reports. You can play with more dimensions of course, but I am just talking dayparting remember?</li>
</ol>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve done that, preview the report and test away until you get it like you want it. If it&#8217;s that good and you have more than one client that can use it, you can save it to all of them. Nice huh? Yay for time saving! The rest &#8230; you should know what to do with. Pick the best hours, see if there are some major drop offs in traffic and purchasing, and review the data with the client (or executives).</p>
<p>For more information on dayparting check out these resources:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?answer=136676" target="_blank">Google Dayparting</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/yahoo-day-parting-has-arrived/" target="_blank">Yahoo Dayparting</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/use-day-parting-to-increase-your-business/" target="_blank">AdCenter Dayparting (aka Bing/MSN)</a> (note that Brad covers Google here too, I &lt;3 Brad)</li>
</ul>
<p>So that was the quick and dirty &#8211; please comment with any questions and I&#8217;ll do my best to answer or point you to a resource with the answer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html">PPC Tip: Dayparting using Google Analytics</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Bing Work?</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/06/did-bing-work.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/06/did-bing-work.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s too early to tell, but the more I hear about people talking about the more I come down to one conclusion. Search marketers can talk about it all day, and it makes no difference. We live this stuff. We get mad at Ask for taking away Jeeves. We analyze every change. How will I [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/06/did-bing-work.html">Did Bing Work?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too early to tell, but the more I hear about people talking about the more I come down to one conclusion. Search marketers can talk about it all day, and it makes no difference. We live this stuff. We get mad at Ask for taking away Jeeves. We analyze every change.</p>
<p>How will I know if Microsoft made Bing work?</p>
<p><strong>When my mom asks about it and starts using it. </strong></p>
<p>I have always known that no matter what I think has hit the main stream, it hasn&#8217;t really until I see real people using it without prompting. Time will tell. And no, she hasn&#8217;t asked yet. I can&#8217;t wait for the day she does. It&#8217;ll be testing time then.</p>
<p>What you don&#8217;t use your family as guinea pigs? <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/06/did-bing-work.html">Did Bing Work?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/06/did-bing-work.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ask Attempt</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longhornkate.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard from a number of people in the industry that the new CEO of Ask has been contacting them trying to get them back as brand ambassadors. Smart move? Yes. Executed well? No. The CEO, if he isn&#8217;t already, needs to be reading Seth Godin&#8217;s blog. If he is already, I would suggest not [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html">The Ask Attempt</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard from a <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080626-084554.php">number</a> of people in the industry that the new CEO of Ask has been contacting them trying to get them back as brand ambassadors. Smart move? Yes. Executed well? No.</p>
<p>The CEO, if he isn&#8217;t already, needs to be reading <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/">Seth Godin&#8217;s blog</a>. If he is already, I would suggest <strong>not</strong> skimming the entries. Why? It looks like he got the concept &#8211; the company made a boo-boo, and he knew that many influential bloggers we mad. So he reached out to them.</p>
<p><em>What did he miss? </em></p>
<ol>
<li>He insulted most of them in an <a href="http://www.forbes.com/technology/2008/05/15/iac-ask-deal-tech-internet-cx_ag_0515techask.html">article on Forbes</a>.</li>
<li>He missed meetings.  (can&#8217;t say who with, they like their twitts anonymous)</li>
<li>He missed the entire point they had all been making.</li>
</ol>
<p>Why do I talk about Ask so much? Well they keep giving me reasons to AND I still think they have some great people with some great ideas. Remember my idea of an Ask/Yahoo deal? Well I have one thing to say to the Ask.com employees:</p>
<p><strong>Yahoo is hiring.</strong></p>
<p>Go take your ideas to a company with a greater following and the infrastructure to top the industry. Yahoo is hurting, but I think with the right ideas (the kind we see at Ask) they can take off again. I know the executives at Ask wanted Yahoo bought out, but that was just for PR purposes. We all know that was and still is a BAD idea.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Few more articles as of late. One is from <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/06/ask_core_search.html" target="_blank">The Lisa</a> about Ask&#8217;s attempts with her. And the other is about how they are outsourcing various areas, to <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080702-083139.php" target="_blank">Microsoft no doubt</a>. *sigh*</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html">The Ask Attempt</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Micosoft Sucks Keynote</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/micosoft-sucks-keynote.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/micosoft-sucks-keynote.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think EricLander got it right with this twitter and ScottPolk with this. The keynote was all about a political speech from Microsoft. All bark, and no bite. We all hope they listen to what we had to say at the end but I doubt it. Want the real recap? See Lisa&#8217;s interp. First off, [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/micosoft-sucks-keynote.html">Micosoft Sucks Keynote</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think EricLander got it right with this <a href="http://twitter.com/EricLander/statuses/826134010">twitter</a> and ScottPolk with <a href="http://twitter.com/scottpolk/statuses/826121113">this</a>. The keynote was all about a political speech from Microsoft. All bark, and no bite. We all hope they listen to what we had to say at the end but I doubt it. Want the real recap? <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/06/smx_advanced_op.html">See Lisa&#8217;s interp</a>.</p>
<p>First off, Kevin says that their advertising is the key. But their platform sucks and the fun part was we told him that at the end. The attendees all complained about various things like an external editor (which they HAVE, and I want to test, but we&#8217;ll see if it matches AdWords Editor). We&#8217;ll see how far the suggestions get.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Word of the Day: Entrenched<br />
</span>Kevin: Google is entrenched, we need to be that other competitor. We care about the end user and are the underdog.<br />
My Thoughts: Microsoft is entrenched in the rest of the digital world and they are bitching about Google being the big dog? Please!</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Microsoft Focus: Commercial</span><br />
Read: We are paying for people to use us. (Hey Danny made fun of it too!!)</p>
<p>So is MSFT going to be focusing on the buyer and letting Google be the information engine? Sounds about right actually. But remember, people look before buying. And few of the 6.6 billion people in this world are going to know that they can get the right info at Google and then get paid by MSFT. Again I say (and I shouted earlier), fix the algo first.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Second Buzz Word of the Day: User Experience</span><br />
My thought is that there is none. And most everyone at SMX agree with me. How can you point to user experience as a focus/strength when you have <a href="http://twitter.com/EricLander/statuses/826125205">no users</a>??</p>
<p>Then there was talk about The Yahoo deal. I loved this, they were looking for a &#8220;fast and friendly&#8221; deal. Pwtth. Ha. That was followed by the best comment of the day. SRSLY. <span style="font-style:italic;">Kevin says IE is better than FF.</span> I can&#8217;t even tell you how many twitters showed up when he said that. Dude, MSFT copied FF for IE7 and badly. Quit making all the developers in here laugh. Hell, <a href="http://twitter.com/LisaBarone/statuses/826118962">Lisa almost choked</a> on her non-existent bagel.</p>
<p>Come on MSFT, I get good results from you &#8211; focus on what makes us happy! Don&#8217;t tell me you are investing in a world class ad platform. When I see results from that I&#8217;ll believe you. Until then I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/micosoft-sucks-keynote.html">Micosoft Sucks Keynote</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/micosoft-sucks-keynote.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google, Ask, What&#8217;s Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/google-ask-whats-next.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/google-ask-whats-next.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read a story about how Google is heading downwards in financial terms. Of course this has little impact on their status as the search engine leader, but its interesting to read today. One reason really &#8230; Ask.com The morons (sorry, its true) at Ask.com have decided to go back to the 1996 way [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/google-ask-whats-next.html">Google, Ask, What&#8217;s Next?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-google5mar05,1,5341811.story">story</a> about how Google is heading downwards in financial terms. Of course this has little impact on their status as the search engine leader, but its interesting to read today. One reason really &#8230; Ask.com</p>
<p>The <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080304-145509.php">morons</a> (sorry, its true) at Ask.com have decided to go back to the 1996 way of doing things and stop playing with the big boys.</p>
<p>Partner this with Yahoo&#8217;s downturn &#8230; and all of a sudden I am scared. Seriously. I really don&#8217;t like MSN. I don&#8217;t like AdCenter, and I don&#8217;t need them taking Yahoo and the second position. I want innovation. I want the ideas at ask! </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m with <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/03/goodbye_askcom.html">Lisa</a> &#8230; today sucks for the search world. I finally get happy about the state of the US, and then my search world goes to hell. *sigh* I want all parts of my life out of hell at least once.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/google-ask-whats-next.html">Google, Ask, What&#8217;s Next?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/google-ask-whats-next.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How is this going to Pass?</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft tried to buy Facebook to no avail. Now they are trying with Yahoo. And Google got flack with Doubleclick? Wait &#8230; why isn&#8217;t anyone noticing that MSN is buying EVERYONE again. There may still be competition, but really?? I am still riding the fence on this one though. There is some real good that [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html">How is this going to Pass?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft tried to buy Facebook to no avail. Now they are trying with Yahoo. And Google got flack with Doubleclick? Wait &#8230; why isn&#8217;t anyone noticing that MSN is buying EVERYONE again. There may still be competition, but really??</p>
<p>I am still riding the fence on this one though. There is some real good that COULD come from a Yahoo/Microsoft merger. But I still am not a fan of Microsoft. So what I really need to say is Go Ask Go!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html">How is this going to Pass?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSN Might Be Getting There</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/msn-might-be-getting-there.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/msn-might-be-getting-there.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vanessa Fox just published a live blog from MSN&#8217;s event yesterday announcing their changes to MSN (aka LIVE search). They recognize that their relevance sucks and they aren&#8217;t talking to webmasters. So &#8230; they&#8217;re fixing it. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens. MSN Might Be Getting There is a post from: Kate Morris<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/msn-might-be-getting-there.html">MSN Might Be Getting There</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/070927-000001.php">Vanessa Fox</a> just published a live blog from MSN&#8217;s event yesterday announcing their changes to MSN (aka LIVE search). They recognize that their relevance sucks and they aren&#8217;t talking to webmasters. So &#8230; they&#8217;re fixing it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/msn-might-be-getting-there.html">MSN Might Be Getting There</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/msn-might-be-getting-there.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
