<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kate Morris &#187; Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katemorris.com/category/search-engines/yahoo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katemorris.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Tip: Dayparting using Google Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katemorris.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good friend of mine that is getting into PPC asked me a question today. A question that I think is common to many people that are really digging into their campaigns. I am not talking to people just getting started (though you should read this too if you are) but those that are wanting [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html">PPC Tip: Dayparting using Google Analytics</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://davinciautomata.wordpress.com/2007/06/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-995 alignright" title="clock_screen02" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/clock_screen02-300x225.jpg" alt="clock_screen02" width="300" height="225" /></a>A good friend of mine that is getting into PPC asked me a question today. A question that I think is common to many people that are really digging into their campaigns. I am not talking to people just getting started <em>(though you should read this too if you are)</em> but those that are wanting to find the next step in campaign optimization.</p>
<p>The question centered around dayparting in Google but based on the specific industry their client was in, so after I guessed (educated guess, really &#8230;), I told them to look at the company&#8217;s analytics and see where their clients were visiting and buying. The retort was &#8220;Google Analytics doesn&#8217;t tell me that.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Poppycock. </strong></p>
<p>But I understood the confusion. Information by hour isn&#8217;t readily available but it is there. And I am going to show you how to pull the data. But to start, let&#8217;s review why dayparting might be important to you.</p>
<h3>Dayparting</h3>
<p>We get this term from traditional marketing. I first learned it in Introduction to Media Buying at The University of Texas. It had to do with radio and TV time purchasing. Imagine my delight when PPC started using it too. And it&#8217;s about the same. Dayparting is molding your spend to specific days and hours of the day to match when your best customers are looking.</p>
<p>Dayparting is not for every company. If you are a consumer based company, people are probably searching for your products at any hour of the day. Business-to-business firms are going to be more open to specifying a time of day. Consider business software &#8211; you might have some hard core people searching at night, or small business owners, but if your product is not focused to them, you probably don&#8217;t want to be running at 2am. Right? Good. Moving on.</p>
<h3>When are your Customers Online?</h3>
<p>Your analytics package should be able to tell you when customers are on your site. Above that, you should be tracking what time of the day people are purchasing if you are ecommerce. Google Analytics does provide this information to you, you just have to know where to look. Custom Reports FTW.</p>
<p>1. Get into your Google Analytics Account and find the <strong>&#8220;Custom Reporting&#8221; </strong>button on the left side navigation.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-984" title="GA Sidebar" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-10-at-2.10.18-AM-150x150.png" alt="GA Sidebar" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>2. Click and get the bigger menu. At the bottom click on <strong>&#8220;Manage Custom Reports.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>3. In the upper right side, click on <strong>&#8220;Create new custom report.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-985" title="Custom Text" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-10-at-2.12.46-AM.png" alt="Custom Text" width="242" height="54" /><br />
</strong></p>
<p>4. Title it (you&#8217;ll forget later) &#8211; hit edit next to the &#8220;Custom Report blah blah blah&#8221; up at the top.</p>
<p>5. First pick the metrics you want to see (in blue, see below). I am a fan of the metrics below, it&#8217;s a good place to start when you aren&#8217;t sure what to look at.</p>
<ul>
<li>Unique Visitors</li>
<li>Unique Pageviews</li>
<li>Total Goal Completions (you have to have goals set up to get data here)</li>
<li>Avg. Time on Site</li>
<li>Unique Purchases (must be e-commerce to use this)</li>
<li>Bounce Rate</li>
</ul>
<h3>Sample Google Analytics Dayparting Report Setup</h3>
<h3><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-987" title="sample dayparting report" src="http://www.katemorris.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Screen-shot-2009-12-10-at-2.15.04-AM.png" alt="sample dayparting report" width="578" height="277" /></h3>
<p>6. Once you get those, move to the green aka dimensions. This is where you pick what you are looking at. You can do one of three things here, or I recommend one of three.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Use one dimension </strong>- Time of Day &#8211; this is the minimal report and will help you see overall trends for time of day.</li>
<li><strong>Use two dimensions</strong> &#8211; (1) Day (2) Time of Day &#8211; this gets down to each day and how things worked out each hour. More detailed but maybe too detailed for some.</li>
<li><strong>Make both. </strong> <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Two separate reports. You can play with more dimensions of course, but I am just talking dayparting remember?</li>
</ol>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve done that, preview the report and test away until you get it like you want it. If it&#8217;s that good and you have more than one client that can use it, you can save it to all of them. Nice huh? Yay for time saving! The rest &#8230; you should know what to do with. Pick the best hours, see if there are some major drop offs in traffic and purchasing, and review the data with the client (or executives).</p>
<p>For more information on dayparting check out these resources:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?answer=136676" target="_blank">Google Dayparting</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ask.enquiro.com/2009/yahoo-day-parting-has-arrived/" target="_blank">Yahoo Dayparting</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/use-day-parting-to-increase-your-business/" target="_blank">AdCenter Dayparting (aka Bing/MSN)</a> (note that Brad covers Google here too, I &lt;3 Brad)</li>
</ul>
<p>So that was the quick and dirty &#8211; please comment with any questions and I&#8217;ll do my best to answer or point you to a resource with the answer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html">PPC Tip: Dayparting using Google Analytics</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2009/12/ppc-tip-dayparting-using-google-analytics.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ask Attempt</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longhornkate.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard from a number of people in the industry that the new CEO of Ask has been contacting them trying to get them back as brand ambassadors. Smart move? Yes. Executed well? No. The CEO, if he isn&#8217;t already, needs to be reading Seth Godin&#8217;s blog. If he is already, I would suggest not [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html">The Ask Attempt</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard from a <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080626-084554.php">number</a> of people in the industry that the new CEO of Ask has been contacting them trying to get them back as brand ambassadors. Smart move? Yes. Executed well? No.</p>
<p>The CEO, if he isn&#8217;t already, needs to be reading <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/">Seth Godin&#8217;s blog</a>. If he is already, I would suggest <strong>not</strong> skimming the entries. Why? It looks like he got the concept &#8211; the company made a boo-boo, and he knew that many influential bloggers we mad. So he reached out to them.</p>
<p><em>What did he miss? </em></p>
<ol>
<li>He insulted most of them in an <a href="http://www.forbes.com/technology/2008/05/15/iac-ask-deal-tech-internet-cx_ag_0515techask.html">article on Forbes</a>.</li>
<li>He missed meetings.  (can&#8217;t say who with, they like their twitts anonymous)</li>
<li>He missed the entire point they had all been making.</li>
</ol>
<p>Why do I talk about Ask so much? Well they keep giving me reasons to AND I still think they have some great people with some great ideas. Remember my idea of an Ask/Yahoo deal? Well I have one thing to say to the Ask.com employees:</p>
<p><strong>Yahoo is hiring.</strong></p>
<p>Go take your ideas to a company with a greater following and the infrastructure to top the industry. Yahoo is hurting, but I think with the right ideas (the kind we see at Ask) they can take off again. I know the executives at Ask wanted Yahoo bought out, but that was just for PR purposes. We all know that was and still is a BAD idea.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Few more articles as of late. One is from <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2008/06/ask_core_search.html" target="_blank">The Lisa</a> about Ask&#8217;s attempts with her. And the other is about how they are outsourcing various areas, to <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080702-083139.php" target="_blank">Microsoft no doubt</a>. *sigh*</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html">The Ask Attempt</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/06/the-ask-attempt.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL+ASK+Yahoo?</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/aolaskyahoo.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/aolaskyahoo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got a call from AOL marketing services yesterday. Bit of a surprise to me, but then I thought about how many times I&#8217;ve heard AOL&#8217;s name in the past week and was surprised no longer. From new executives to the acquisition of Bebo, their like 105th acquisition in the past year (I exaggerate), I [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/aolaskyahoo.html">AOL+ASK+Yahoo?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got a call from <a href="http://advisor.aol.com">AOL marketing services</a> yesterday. Bit of a surprise to me, but then I thought about how many times I&#8217;ve heard AOL&#8217;s name in the past week and was surprised no longer. From <a href="http://corp.aol.com/press-releases/2008/03/lynda-clarizio-named-president-aol-s-platform">new executives</a> to the <a href="http://corp.aol.com/press-releases/2008/05/aol-completes-acquisition-global-social-media-network-bebo">acquisition of Bebo</a>, their like 105th acquisition in the past year (I exaggerate), I can see they are on the move.</p>
<p>Then thinking about how Time Warner is planning to spin them off got me thinking. Ask just made a dumb move focusing just on women (I am one and all, but really??), Yahoo is in trouble, and AOL is going psycho. </p>
<p>Humor me for a second. How interesting would this situation be? Ask and AOL merge, which is highly probable according to other <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/12-search-engines-which-can-replace-askcom/6518/">industry experts</a> (and AOL&#8217;s 106th acquisition), forming the now AOL. I propose another name or something &#8212; but with AOL&#8217;s base, Ask&#8217;s technology, Quigo/Ads.com and <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080313/100047535.shtml">AIM/Bebo</a>, they have something there.</p>
<p>Take that company and put that up against the top 3. Now remember that Yahoo is in danger of being bought out. I don&#8217;t want that to be Microsoft, so why not merge the new AOL/ASK and Yahoo? Talk about a powerhouse! Ideas, technology, subscribers galore! That is the only way I can see anyone giving Google a run for their money.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/aolaskyahoo.html">AOL+ASK+Yahoo?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/03/aolaskyahoo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How is this going to Pass?</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft tried to buy Facebook to no avail. Now they are trying with Yahoo. And Google got flack with Doubleclick? Wait &#8230; why isn&#8217;t anyone noticing that MSN is buying EVERYONE again. There may still be competition, but really?? I am still riding the fence on this one though. There is some real good that [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html">How is this going to Pass?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft tried to buy Facebook to no avail. Now they are trying with Yahoo. And Google got flack with Doubleclick? Wait &#8230; why isn&#8217;t anyone noticing that MSN is buying EVERYONE again. There may still be competition, but really??</p>
<p>I am still riding the fence on this one though. There is some real good that COULD come from a Yahoo/Microsoft merger. But I still am not a fan of Microsoft. So what I really need to say is Go Ask Go!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html">How is this going to Pass?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2008/02/how-is-this-going-to-pass.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo/Google PPC Feature Sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/yahoogoogle-ppc-feature-sharing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/yahoogoogle-ppc-feature-sharing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I need to rant about the features of Yahoo versus Google. Who has what and what they need to share. First off, I am setting up Yahoo with all of my company&#8217;s accounts. We spend lots with Google every month and are wanting to do the same (maybe not AS much) with Yahoo. So I [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/yahoogoogle-ppc-feature-sharing.html">Yahoo/Google PPC Feature Sharing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to rant about the features of Yahoo versus Google. Who has what and what they need to share. </p>
<p>First off, I am setting up Yahoo with all of my company&#8217;s accounts. We spend lots with Google every month and are wanting to do the same (maybe not AS much) with Yahoo. So I start with my first question, how do I get all of these keywords and data from Google to Yahoo? When I first started in search marketing, it was all by hand. And if you were a BIG Yahoo client, they let you load a spreadsheet. Man, that was a good day for the agency I was working for at the time. </p>
<p>Alas, things have gotten easier &#8230; sort of. Using <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/adwordseditor/">Google AdWords Editor</a>, you can export your campaigns from Google <span style="font-weight:bold;">(Good Job Google!)</span>. But you can&#8217;t just throw that into Yahoo. They use different inputs. So I started looking into redoing the info to be Yahoo! friendly. And guess what?? <span style="font-weight:bold;">They have a <a href="http://help21.marketingsolutions.yahoo.com/helpui/resources/content/us.market/content.source/en.language/16507.html">converter</a>!</span> I was excited! I would have this seemingly 40 hour project done in an hour. I downloaded all my campaigns and loaded those into the converter. </p>
<p>It &#8220;converted successfully&#8221; and said to load the new sheets into the import engine. I did so &#8230; and got an error. The header in the sheet they gave me was wrong. </p>
<p>Wait &#8230; didn&#8217;t Yahoo give me that sheet? Weren&#8217;t they supposed to convert it for me? I looked at the sheet they gave me, and the template they provide on the import engine. Sure enough, the headers are different. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Annoying Yahoo Thing #1</span></p>
<p>I figured out what to do to get it to import a few hours later and have been working on it since then. But this is what irritates me, why can&#8217;t this be easier? You two use the same ad size, etc. But really, why make it this hard to do this? I won&#8217;t mention what else I saw in the &#8220;converted&#8221; sheet I got from Yahoo! but the ads weren&#8217;t right. </p>
<p>So then I got to thinking about something else. Yahoo has this nice converter, and Google might, but I don&#8217;t know about it right now. I recently asked my Google AdWords team (they are GREAT) about Manager Defined Spend and getting restricted logins. They set me up with BETAs. They listened and gave me what I wanted with the logins, but it was stuff I had already seen in Yahoo. There are things that Yahoo does better. </p>
<p>Logging into accounts into Google vs Yahoo. In Google I can assign people to accounts, and they only need one login. Right now in Google, if I want to give someone reports access on 2 accounts, they need 2 different logins. Hmmm &#8230; <span style="font-weight:bold;">Annoying Google Thing #1</span></p>
<p>But something Google does better is payment. Yahoo only allows CC and PayPal. Well I love invoicing. My Accounting department loves invoicing. Less CC bills. But that&#8217;s not an option in Yahoo right now. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Annoying Yahoo Thing #2</span></p>
<p>So I guess the point is that I have been doing this for a while. And it has gotten easier, but it could be so much easier if the industry leaders would set some standards. Share you two and help us all. And if you can&#8217;t share &#8230; steal. You use each other&#8217;s systems. Steal away, you already do. <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/yahoogoogle-ppc-feature-sharing.html">Yahoo/Google PPC Feature Sharing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/09/yahoogoogle-ppc-feature-sharing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Mail</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/yahoo-mail.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/yahoo-mail.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! just released (out of beta that is) their new user interface for Yahoo! mail. So I&#8217;ve used it before because I have a paid account (read: I use AT&#038;T DSL), but it&#8217;s gotten even better. I&#8217;m excited because you can text to a phone and get them back in a really cool format. Hmm [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/yahoo-mail.html">Yahoo! Mail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! just released (out of beta that is) their <a href="http://yodel.yahoo.com/2007/08/27/introducing-the-all-new-yahoo-mail/">new user interface for Yahoo! mail</a>. So I&#8217;ve used it before because I have a paid account (read: I use AT&#038;T DSL), but it&#8217;s gotten even better. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited because you can text to a phone and get them back in a really cool format. Hmm &#8230; Google? Wanna play catch up on this feature? I would love it if gmail did this too. <img src='http://www.katemorris.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Update: So I realize that we all can email texts and email back, but not in the cool interface Yahoo gave us. That&#8217;s what I mean.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/yahoo-mail.html">Yahoo! Mail</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/yahoo-mail.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook: The Real Post</title>
		<link>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/facebook-the-real-post.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/facebook-the-real-post.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Morris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://longhornkate.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From SES San Jose via SEORoundTable: The question he&#8217;s been getting a lot: Is Facebook the next Google? I think they are two different things. Can Facebook get the same kind of hype? Yes, that&#8217;s the &#8220;likeness&#8221; it has to GOogle. Facebook has experienced 2 tipping points according to the statistics &#8211; corporate network and [...]<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/facebook-the-real-post.html">Facebook: The Real Post</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From SES San Jose via <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/014527.html">SEORoundTable</a>:<br />
<blockquote>The question he&#8217;s been getting a lot: Is Facebook the next Google? I think they are two different things. Can Facebook get the same kind of hype? Yes, that&#8217;s the &#8220;likeness&#8221; it has to GOogle.</p>
<p>Facebook has experienced 2 tipping points according to the statistics &#8211; corporate network and opening access to anyone with an email address. There&#8217;s definitely a market share increase of pages: the site broke into the top 10 of all Internet sites in March 2007. Opening application development could lead to the next tipping point. </p></blockquote>
<p>Here are my thoughts on Facebook and it&#8217;s popularity. I was on it when it started. I still had access to my college email address then (don&#8217;t anymore, 3 years after graduation) and liked it. But more of my old friends from HS were on MySpace. They were allowed there. </p>
<p>But Facebook was cleaner. </p>
<p>Then they opened it to everyone and it gained popularity. But I have a theory, a more unseen one, as to who Facebook is more popular. It&#8217;s not banned at work yet. </p>
<p>MySpace was/is a time hog. I used to spend hours making my page look right, changing it on my mood, and I know code! Most people don&#8217;t &#8230; imagine how long that took?</p>
<p>But now with applications and such, and the opening to everyone &#8230; I am thinking it&#8217;s only a matter of time. I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s going down. I&#8217;m just saying it&#8217;s not any better. It&#8217;s just different. Google vs Yahoo. They both have their uses.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/facebook-the-real-post.html">Facebook: The Real Post</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.katemorris.com">Kate Morris</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katemorris.com/2007/08/facebook-the-real-post.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
